"Human condition."

first Jews from Germany, Arendt. Of her went to America after fleeing Nazi persecution, book by the English is very difficult to understand. Circuitous writing and that it is not forced and likely approaching to the heart of the problem, many of the episodes like flaunt the knowledgeable they are, are more difficult to read her book. Nevertheless, the problems that she raised, the possibility of the resolution, there is serving face of the leading thinkers vivid. This document, the labor of human active life, work, were discussed from three aspects of activities, primary work of Arendt. We How do the "free", and will be able to "richly to live." Its essential insight is shown strong. 1. Labor, work, activities "By the term vita activa, I, three basic human activity force, ie, labor, work, want to to mean the activity." Famous, labor in active life, work, activity concept device. And labor, it of vital activities. The work, that of activities that create an artificial world. For example, it's that the craftsman or make a chair. And activities and, the thing of the activities that are made in the relationship with the people. Such as speech activities and commercial activities falls on it. Arendt himself, but he does not say clearly, in my feeling, this division, when you think of "what to do in our lives rich in society", pretty useful. Below, we want to and I think the thing to continue to introduce this book from this point of view. 2. The emergence of social area And in considering the above-mentioned problems, Arendt, go to historically clarify the first society become things of the rise. If you say "strictly, the advent of neither social area intended public without those private is a relatively new phenomenon, its origin is the same time and modern appearance, the political form of nation It is seen in the nation. " In ancient Greece, private area and public area (Police) (family) had been clearly distinguished. So Arendt says. Because family, that of natural communities that have been dominated by the "necessary". In order to live, the family must earn the daily bread to cooperate. Police contrast, those who have overcome this biological need, a joint body to be "free". Biological needs captive not those who gathered, I engaged decide on their own that their a "free" life. In ancient Greece, in order to be "free", it is necessary to overcome the biological necessary to have initially. But it is just the labor and production only to engage, was also intended to be a possible only if there is the presence of the slaves. On the other hand, or "free" of us in modern times can be if collateral. In the modern, "free" of the million people first has been released. It is short, but the fact that each person has their own biological need, no longer must satisfy himself. We no longer, we can not afford to have them produce what you need in the "slave" to our survival. Thus modern times, was to first "animal for labor," each person. "All modern communities are within quickly, it became to the center of labor is the only active power required to sustain life." From there, things become "social" in the modern is I was supposed to occur. Arendt points out so. First, animal serving as human beings to labor, become gradually as we won the property. And, it would like hope that this is guaranteed by what is "public". That is, until it while there was a "private" (family) to come out beyond the area "public" (Police) area, a "private" area,'ll have protection by the "public" area It idea appeared that. Thus strict distinction between "I" and "public" is no longer, the region that they are intertwined with each other "society" has emerged. Arendt argue so. In addition, modernization is also the era production has expanded explosively by the division of labor. This means, the "labor" of each person, rather than a lonely work, but that came to be Itonama in people's relationships. Such a thing of the relationship between the mesh also Arendt referred to as a "society" in this book. 3. Labor advantage of modern As we have seen above, modernization is labor advantage of the era. And it is grave by production value through the labor at all. "We already are alive in society, such as calculated by the consumption of power to earn what's called wealth. And, because the power of this earning and consumption, two aspects of the metabolism of the human body to perform and than is not only of deformation. " You get what you need in life by working, to consume this. Only a succession of such a kind of metabolism, has become our lives. Arendt points out so. "When you try to us what, it is believed to be for all the" make a living ". It is a judgment of society." 4. Work people to work Human beings to labor, whereas that become a slave of the day-to-day life, what work people to do the job is the ruler of this world. So Arendt says. They because freely, can make their own world. "Only just with the image for the product of the future alone is production freely, than is free to destroy the work of their own hands." In However modern works of these tools who also, after all has been consumed as a consumer product. If it would be would be "animal that labor" and "animal to do the job", human beings anyway, is reduced to the presence of as What, he not be seen as Who. In this way human beings, has become a thoroughly exchange can exist. Arendt points out so. And it should by no means "rich" students, and. In our raw, or can become richer if how. keywords that Arendt presents is "activities". Five. Activity "Human beings, through speech and activity, simply to try Nukindeyo beyond the dimension of" different things ". This means that speech and activities with each other, human beings, rather than as a physical object, as a human being, in a manner that appears to mutual It is there We, just instead of being seen as "What is" (what) as an exchange value, must be of the "either who the" as people themselves seen and (who). That's the insight of Arendt. And it says. To that end, we and he need to "act" and "words". "This is because these two abilities, naturally much the same as the production is to produce the use object, it is because to produce a meaningful story." However, the area of ​​this "speech", "activity" is a very unstable world. Because Man is a diverse and do not know what kind of "speech (thought)" appears, what kind of "activities" you do not know may have the power. But this does not mean in any way intended to enrich the human students to control this. So Arendt says. How much area of ​​freedom and "free speech", "activity" is or may be collateral. This is, we can be rich to live, that is the biggest of the conditions themselves that Ae exchange with others the "Who, or is". In I wonder this instability of the region it can be overcome by how I. Idea of ​​Arendt's as follows. Relief against irreversible and impossible prophecy of the process to start the "activities, another with it, rather than coming from higher capacity something, one of the potential of activity itself is hitting in relief. Because irreversibility, does not know that the person is performing the own, even though not can be known, yourself is that not possible to undo that had done. The Kedasu de from predicament of irreversibility possible remedy is the ability of forgiveness. On the other hand, uncertainty that was chaotic in the future, in other words, the remedy against improper prophecy of promise was, has been included in the ability to keep a promise. " "Because sovereign, whether personal entity called personality, and any collective entity of people, if required by a single entity in isolation, it is. However, constrained by the promise of mutual always false In the case of a large number of people, is limited to have a reality. In this case sovereignty, as a result, was born in case you have escaped to some extent the future of Fukasoku resistance. because the degree, a promise, limit that is included in the capacity itself to protect to be the same thing. " Forgiveness and promise of ability. This is, it is a condition to live rich through the "speech", "activities". Arendt argue so.